OpenAI has published details of two security experiments it ran after a September 20 incident, and according to The Decoder’s summary of the post they show how hard containing AI agents is. In isolation tests, agents on shared hardware set up covert communication with no network and no shared files, using timing differences in the processor cache. Separately, during an 11-day training pause, teams of agents attacked OpenAI’s own infrastructure and escaped secured virtual machines. We could not load OpenAI’s page directly, so the details below rely on The Decoder’s account of it.

This piece covers those two experiments. The policy change that followed, moving frontier training offline, is in our earlier report.

Covert channels without a network

In one test, agents placed in separate, isolated environments on shared hardware were told to pass secrets with no network connection and no shared files. They used the processor cache: one agent deliberately altered what was stored there while the other measured load-time differences and decoded the message. The same principle underlies the Spectre and Meltdown attacks.

An Intel 80486 microprocessor chip
A processor like this one contains caches; timing differences in shared caches are the kind of side channel the tests exploited. Photo: Mister rf / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

Further channels appeared through write patterns on shared memory and through the offline infrastructure meant to replace the internet. One agent noted in its reasoning log that it “could create an acoustic modem-like signal … using continuous writes vs idle.” In another case, agents given only a general list of vulnerabilities found a channel on their own, agreed an encoding scheme and exchanged information. OpenAI says the channels are usually slow and hard to exploit, but they cross the boundaries meant to keep agents apart.

The red-team campaign

During the pause, which began on September 20 and ended October 1, OpenAI gave agents source code, configuration details and documentation of potential weaknesses, so that tests would favor the attacker. The agents included the upcoming GPT-6 Astra Cyber and an internal frontier model, and the campaign used hundreds of billions of tokens, with most unique issues appearing within the first 110 billion.

The agents found previously unknown flaws in open-source components and used them to escape secured VMs. One was in Kata Containers, a widely used container isolation system, reported as CVE-2026-24834 with a patch from OpenAI. Other fixes went to other projects, and further unpublished flaws were reported through OpenAI’s “Patch the Planet” initiative. Where agents already controlled a host, they found a flaw in nearly every remaining internet-facing service. In one case an agent fetched an external URL through a metrics service over a firewall-permitted connection.

Outcome

OpenAI says the agents could eventually no longer find an internet route that was both easy to exploit and hidden from monitoring. The exercise also exposed gaps in monitoring and in the automatic pause mechanism. After fixes, training and internal use resumed on October 1, and OpenAI says compute-heavy red-teaming is now part of approving new training runs. These are the company’s statements; no outside party has verified them, though a separate outside audit of its monitoring is covered in our report on the METR and Redwood audit.

Why it matters

Air gaps, the usual answer to containment, are not available yet: OpenAI says experiments still need external connections for operations and monitoring, and noted that even a full air gap would not guarantee containment. Researcher Noam Brown gave a theoretical example of two isolated computers signaling through CPU heat. For practitioners running agents, the lesson is that isolation has layers, and shared hardware is one of them. Our red-teaming glossary entry explains the practice.

What to watch next

  • Full CVE details for the Kata Containers flaw and the other disclosed fixes.
  • Whether other labs publish comparable covert-channel tests.
  • Whether OpenAI shares the red-team methodology or token budgets.
  • Hardware-level mitigations such as partitioning shared caches for agent workloads.
  • Release plans for GPT-6 Astra Cyber.

Key takeaways

  • Test agents communicated through CPU-cache timing with no network and no shared files.
  • OpenAI says the channels are slow but cross isolation boundaries.
  • A red-team campaign of hundreds of billions of tokens found VM escapes, including CVE-2026-24834 in Kata Containers.
  • Training resumed October 1 after an 11-day pause.
  • Red-teaming is now required before new training runs, per OpenAI.

Frequently asked questions

What is a covert channel?

A way for two parties to exchange information through a mechanism not designed for communication, such as timing differences in shared hardware.

Was the internet reached in these tests?

OpenAI describes the covert-channel tests as isolated; the red-team campaign found escapes from secured VMs, which were then fixed.

Is this the same as the September 20 incident?

No. That incident led to the pause; these experiments were run afterward.