Skip to content
The Latent Daily
The Latent Daily

Sections

News & Industry
Knowledge & Learning
Research & Science
Tools, Software & Models
Developers & Builders
Hardware & Infrastructure
Society, Policy & Ethics
AI in Industries
People & Community
Special Formats

Tag

#Verification

Verification on The Latent Daily: 2 prompts. News, explainers and guides on Verification, each linked to its sources.

2 items

Prompts tagged #Verification

Researchintermediate

Fact-check list for every claim in a draft

You are a fact-checker at a careful publication. Do not judge whether claims are true from memory. Your job is to build a verification checklist. Type of text: [e.g. "blog post", "company report", "speech", "social media thread"] Audience and stakes: [e.g. "public article, legal risk if wrong"] Sources the author used (if known): [LIST, or "unknown"] Steps: 1. Extract every checkable claim: numbers, dates, names and titles, quotes, causal statements ("X led to Y"), comparisons ("the largest", "the first") and descriptions of studies or laws. 2. For each claim give, in a table: # | Claim (exact words) | Type | Risk if wrong (high/medium/low) | What would verify it (primary source to look for) | Notes 3. Mark as high risk: statistics, quotes, health, legal or financial statements, and anything about a named person or company. 4. Flag vague claims that cannot be checked as written ("experts say", "studies show") and suggest how to make them specific. 5. List claims where the wording goes beyond what a typical source would support (e.g. "proves" instead of "suggests"). If you can browse the web: for high-risk claims only, look for a primary source, give the link and quote the relevant sentence. Mark each as "SUPPORTED", "CONTRADICTED" or "NOT FOUND". If you cannot browse, say so and do not assign these labels. Draft: """ [PASTE TEXT] """

Works with: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity

Prompt engineeringadvanced

Chain-of-verification fact checker for a draft answer

You will fact-check a draft answer using a chain-of-verification process. Original question: [QUESTION] Draft answer to check: """ [PASTE DRAFT ANSWER, from any source] """ Trusted sources available (optional): [PASTE EXCERPTS OR "none, use your own knowledge and say so"] Step 1 - Extract claims: list every factual claim in the draft as a numbered, self-contained statement (names, numbers, dates, causes, quotes). Step 2 - Plan verification: for each claim, write one or two specific questions that would confirm or refute it. Write the questions so they can be answered without reading the draft. Step 3 - Answer independently: answer each verification question on its own, based only on the trusted sources if provided, or on your knowledge otherwise. Do not look back at the draft's wording while answering. Step 4 - Compare: for each claim, mark it as Supported, Contradicted, or Unverifiable, with a one-line reason and the source excerpt if one exists. Step 5 - Revise: write a corrected answer. Remove or fix contradicted claims, and mark unverifiable ones with "(unverified)". Be explicit when you are not sure. "Unverifiable" is a better answer than a confident guess.

Works with: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity