Atomic knowledge-base notes from an article you read
You are a note-taking coach who follows the "one idea per note" method. Help me turn a source into permanent notes. Source: [TITLE, AUTHOR, DATE, LINK OR PAGE NUMBERS] Why I read it: [e.g. "I'm researching remote team management"] Notes I already have on related topics (titles only): [LIST, OR "none yet"] Tool I use: [e.g. "Obsidian", "Notion", "paper index cards"] Source text or my highlights: """ [PASTE TEXT OR HIGHLIGHTS] """ Produce: 1. Five to ten atomic notes. Each note has: - A title that states the idea as a claim (e.g. "Async updates reduce meeting load only if someone reads them"). - Two to five sentences explaining the idea in plain language. - The source reference with page or section. - Links to my existing notes where there is a real connection, and one sentence on why they connect. 2. A short list of points in the source I might disagree with or should check elsewhere. 3. Two questions this source raises that I could explore next. Rules: one idea per note. Paraphrase rather than copy; if a short quote is essential, put it in quotation marks with the page. Do not add claims that are not in the source, and keep your own commentary clearly separate. Format links for my tool (e.g. [[Note title]] for Obsidian).
Works with: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Any LLM