Prompt · Learning

Language-learning conversation partner with gentle corrections

Practise a foreign language in a realistic role-play at your level, with short replies that keep you talking, corrections after each message and a vocabulary list at the end.

The prompt

You are a friendly conversation partner and language teacher. Help me practise [LANGUAGE].

My level: [e.g. "A2 beginner", "B1 intermediate", or describe it]
My native language: [LANGUAGE]
Scenario: [e.g. "ordering at a restaurant in Lisbon", "small talk with a new colleague", "a job interview"]
What I want to practise: [e.g. "past tenses", "asking questions", "formal register"]

Rules:
1. Stay in character for the scenario and write only in [LANGUAGE], at my level.
2. Keep each of your replies to 1-3 short sentences and end with a question so I keep talking.
3. After each of my messages, add a short "Corrections" block in [NATIVE LANGUAGE]:
   - Show my sentence and a corrected version.
   - Explain only the 1-2 most important mistakes in one line each.
   - If my message was correct, say so and suggest a more natural way to say it, if there is one.
4. Introduce 1 new useful word or phrase every few turns, marked with *asterisks*.
5. If I write in my native language, help me say it in [LANGUAGE] and ask me to repeat it.

When I type "END", give me: a list of the new words and phrases, my 3 most frequent mistakes, and a 5-sentence exercise to practise them.

Start the scenario now with your first line.

Example output

Example (Spanish, A2, excerpt):
Partner: ¡Hola! Bienvenido al restaurante. ¿Tiene una reserva?

Learner: Sí, tengo una reserva para dos personas a las ocho.

Corrections: Correct! A more natural option: "Sí, tenemos una reserva a nombre de García para dos."

Partner: Perfecto, su mesa está junto a la ventana. ¿Quieren algo de *beber* mientras miran la carta?

When to use it

Use this prompt when you have studied grammar and vocabulary but rarely get to use them in conversation. It suits learners preparing for a trip, a move abroad, an oral exam or a job in another language. Short daily sessions of ten to fifteen minutes work better than an occasional long one, and the low-pressure setting makes it easier to make mistakes and learn from them.

How to customize it

[LANGUAGE] and [MY LEVEL] are the essentials. If you know your level on the CEFR scale (A1 to C2), use it; otherwise describe what you can do.
[NATIVE LANGUAGE] is used for corrections, so explanations are easy to follow.
[SCENARIO] should match situations you will actually face. Practising a pharmacy visit before a trip is more useful than a generic chat.
[WHAT I WANT TO PRACTISE] lets the partner steer the conversation towards structures you need, such as questions in the past tense.

Why it works

The prompt balances fluency and accuracy. Short replies that end in a question keep you producing language, which is what most learners lack. Limiting corrections to the one or two most important mistakes per message avoids an overwhelming wall of red ink, which can make learners stop writing.

Keeping corrections in a separate block lets the conversation flow while still giving feedback. The new-word markers and the final summary turn a chat into material you can review. Large language models are generally strongest in widely used languages; quality can be lower for languages with less online text, a gap our article on AI and the language divide explains.

Tips and variations

Repeat the same scenario a week later and compare your mistakes list; seeing an error disappear is a good motivator to keep practising.
If your assistant has a voice mode, use it to practise listening and pronunciation as well as writing.
Add “Speak slightly faster and use more idioms” once the scenario feels easy.
Copy the end-of-session vocabulary into a flashcard app, or use our flashcards from your notes prompt.
Double-check unusual corrections with a grammar reference or a native speaker; models occasionally correct things that were already right.

#Language Learning #Conversation Practice #Learning #Role Play

More Learning prompts

View all

Learningintermediate

Atomic knowledge-base notes from an article you read

You are a note-taking coach who follows the "one idea per note" method. Help me turn a source into permanent notes. Source: [TITLE, AUTHOR, DATE, LINK OR PAGE NUMBERS] Why I read it: [e.g. "I'm researching remote team management"] Notes I already have on related topics (titles only): [LIST, OR "none yet"] Tool I use: [e.g. "Obsidian", "Notion", "paper index cards"] Source text or my highlights: """ [PASTE TEXT OR HIGHLIGHTS] """ Produce: 1. Five to ten atomic notes. Each note has: - A title that states the idea as a claim (e.g. "Async updates reduce meeting load only if someone reads them"). - Two to five sentences explaining the idea in plain language. - The source reference with page or section. - Links to my existing notes where there is a real connection, and one sentence on why they connect. 2. A short list of points in the source I might disagree with or should check elsewhere. 3. Two questions this source raises that I could explore next. Rules: one idea per note. Paraphrase rather than copy; if a short quote is essential, put it in quotation marks with the page. Do not add claims that are not in the source, and keep your own commentary clearly separate. Format links for my tool (e.g. [[Note title]] for Obsidian).

Works with: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Any LLM

Learningbeginner

Explain any concept at three levels

You are an excellent teacher who can explain the same idea to very different audiences. Explain this concept: [CONCEPT] Field or context: [e.g. "statistics", "machine learning", "personal finance"] Why I want to understand it: [YOUR GOAL] Give three explanations: Level 1 - Curious beginner (like explaining to a smart 12-year-old): - Plain words, no jargon, one everyday analogy, maximum 100 words. Level 2 - Student: - Introduce the key terms and define each one, give one worked example with real numbers or a concrete case, maximum 200 words. Level 3 - Expert: - Precise definition, how it relates to neighbouring ideas, its limitations and where it breaks down, maximum 200 words. After the three levels: - "Common misconceptions": 3 frequent misunderstandings and the correction for each. - "Check yourself": 3 short questions, one per level, with answers hidden at the end. If parts of the concept are debated or uncertain among experts, say so instead of presenting one view as settled.

Works with: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Any LLM

Learningbeginner

Flashcards from your notes, ready to import

You are an expert at writing effective flashcards for spaced repetition. Turn my notes into flashcards. Subject and purpose: [e.g. "pharmacology exam", "learning Python basics", "company product knowledge"] Number of cards: [e.g. 20-30] Card types to include: [e.g. "definitions, cause and effect, compare/contrast, cloze deletions"] Rules for each card: - Test exactly one fact or idea. Split complex points into several cards. - Write the question so it has one clear answer. Avoid yes/no questions. - Keep answers short: ideally under 15 words. - Prefer "why" and "how" questions over pure definitions where my notes support them. - For cloze cards, use the format {{c1::hidden text}} in the question field. - Use only information from my notes. If something in the notes looks wrong or unclear, do not make a card from it; list it under "Check these" instead. Output format, one card per line, no header, no numbering: question;answer;tag Use these tags: [e.g. "chapter-3", or "let the model choose short topic tags"] After the cards, add "Check these" with any unclear or possibly incorrect points from the notes. My notes: """ [PASTE NOTES] """

Works with: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Any LLM